House of Rep Members Push for Six-Year Single Term Presidency Despite Rejection

Share

A group of 34 lawmakers in Nigeria’s House of Representatives is advocating for a constitutional amendment to introduce a single six-year term for the presidency, governors, and local government chairpersons. Despite the bill’s rejection during Thursday’s plenary, the proponents, led by Ikenga Ugochinyere (PDP-Imo), have vowed to reintroduce the proposal.

The bill seeks to amend the 1999 Constitution to replace the current two-term, four-year system for the president with a single six-year tenure. It also includes provisions for zonal rotation of presidential and governorship seats and proposes simultaneous elections nationwide.

Ugochinyere, in a statement on Friday, described the rejection as a temporary setback, pledging to continue advocating for the reforms. “The struggle to reform our constitutional democracy to ensure inclusivity and provide justice, equity, and fairness has not been lost,” he said.

Advocacy for Reform

The bill’s sponsors argue that a six-year single term would allow leaders to focus on governance without the distraction of re-election campaigns. Additionally, holding all elections on the same day would reduce costs and minimize electoral malpractice.

Ugochinyere highlighted the importance of a rotational power structure in easing political tensions and ensuring equitable representation across Nigeria’s diverse regions.

Next Steps

Despite the setback, Ugochinyere remains optimistic about the bill’s future. “We will review this decision and explore ways to reintroduce the bill, following proper legislative procedures,” he said, adding that consultations would be intensified to build broader support within the House.

The lawmaker emphasized that the reforms aim to create a more inclusive and efficient democratic process in Nigeria. “We remain determined to achieve a more inclusive and efficient democratic process,” he concluded.

The proposed changes have sparked debate nationwide, with supporters lauding the initiative as a step toward equitable governance and critics questioning its feasibility. The sponsors of the bill are preparing to rally support for its eventual passage.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *