The family of the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, has rejected the recent judgment delivered by Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court in Abuja. The ruling, which upheld Kanu’s conviction and life sentence on terrorism-related charges, has stirred renewed controversy, deepening concerns among supporters who insist that justice has not been served.

According to the family, the judgment does not reflect the realities surrounding Kanu’s arrest, treatment, and continued detention. They argued that the court failed to address key issues they believe undermine the validity of the charges, insisting that the ruling represents a miscarriage of justice. Their statement adds yet another layer of tension to an already heated national conversation on human rights, due process and the handling of separatist-related cases.

As legal teams explore options and public reactions intensify, the family maintains that they will not relent in challenging the ruling until Kanu regains his freedom. With emotions running high and political stakeholders weighing in, how will this latest pushback shape the unfolding legal and political battle over Nnamdi Kanu’s fate? Visit www.jocomms.com for more news